Week 1 - Acquisition Project. SearchAssist product
Picture this
You’re shopping online on a popular fashion app. You start typing “black jacket Men...”. The app auto-suggests "....H&M.". Wow, a black jacket from H&M is exactly what you were looking for, you click the auto-suggested option, and the screen loads.... the excitement is palpable, and you see 186 results that match your search.
You’re eager to browse them all.
Andddddddddd... half of the jackets in those search results are not black, and none of the black jackets are from H&M.
Your shopping experience is ruined.
This is not just true for the shoppers, it's for the employees too...
Looking at the larger picture, the majority of organizations implement the latest tools and solutions. However, the source content and information are scattered across disconnected platforms, making it increasingly difficult for their customers and employees to access information, products, and services. The traditional search options offer keyword-based search results and lack context.
Unsatisfied with the incomplete and non-contextual search results, users often try reaching the customer support center to resolve their queries, resulting in higher wait times and poor customer service.
But what if you had a search assistant that makes information discovery and fulfillment conversational across websites, e-commerce, customer service, and workplaces?
That is exactly what SearchAssist, by Kore.ai, does.
SearchAssist helps deliver highly relevant, accurate, contextual, and personalized search results to all users. It uses the Kore.ai proprietary technology, Large Language Models (LLMs), and Generative AI technologies to deliver next-gen search experience to various users, including employees, consumers, customer support executives, and agents.
Some of the key features of a SearchAssist application include:
The platform has over been adopted by enterprises across industries and has provided excellent results.
When you first visit the website, you have a convenient SSO-login option where you can quickly get started using your Google, MC, or Linkedin IDs.
The user is then taken through simple, and self-explanatory steps, followed by a bride introductory video to ensure they get an overview of the solution, and their trial plan, and that assistance is just a click away.
The app, based on our selection, either automatically creates an experience for us to preview, use and extend/customize it further, or allows us to start from scratch. Below is a tailored experience that I selected as an E-commerce executive. No matter the path you choose, you have the guidance at every step.
The entire process to set up your experience takes less than 5 minutes. You're all set!
As we have seen above, SearchAssist primarily enables enterprises to enhance and improve Customer, Employee, and Support Agents' experience by allowing them to quickly retrieve the information they are looking for from a ton of information.
The use cases have been classified in a broad manner and will cover all the interactions and experiences (customer and employee/agents) that any given enterprise would look to optimize.
To categorize the use cases and the target end-users:
Given the use cases, we will be focusing on targeting and pursuing a specific profile within each use case, to communicate our product's value proposition, benefits, and how the product will fit into their existing infrastructure, and help them.
ICP Name | E-Commerce Platforms | Regular Website search (BFSI, Healthcare, etc) | Large Enterprise (for Employees) | Contact Center (For customers and Agents) |
Persona Position | VP, Customer Experience | Director, digital transformation initiatives / Cheif digital officer | Head, Employee Experience | Director, Contact Center Planning / Head, Customer support |
Age | - | - | - | - |
Organisational Goals | Revenue, enhance customer experience, Increase marketing ROI, | Revenue, increase customer engagement | Better employee experience, Increased efficiency | Lowering Churn, Upselling, optimizing support costs |
Role in buying process | High | Very High | Medium to High | High |
Reporting Structure | Reports to CMO | Reports to CTO | Reports to COO / CHRO | Reports to COO / Country Head |
Preferred Channels | Email, Phone, Face to Face (later stage talks) | Phone, Email, Face-to-Face | Email, Phone | Face to Face (hosting dinners, champagne tasting), Email, Phone |
Products used in workplace | Salesforce, Magento, Khoros, MS Office | Fiserv DNA, MS Office, SharePoint, Kore.ai Platform, ServiceNow, Others (undisclosed) | Google Workspace, Jira, Confluence, ADP | SharePoint, Five9 (CCaaS, and WFM), Salesforce |
Where do they spend time | Ad-Age, LinkedIn, YouTube, Gartner, HubSpot Academy | Forbes, X, ChatGPT, LinkedIn | Blogs, TED Talks, YouTube, LinkedIn | Gartner, LinkedIn, Expo Events |
Pain Points | Low conversion (app open to purchase), Low repeat purchases | Scattered Information, Complex integrations | Frequent contact with the employee helpdesk, Driving tool adoption | High AHT, High TAT, Lower CSAT (not entirely due to agents, some because of policies) |
Objectives | Improve user experience on app/website, increase conversion, increase brand awareness | Increase customer self-service, integrate data sources, establish company as digital first | Increase Employee Retention & Satisfaction Increase Employee Engagement Online | Reduce AHT, repeat contact rates, Improve agent productivity & efficiency, increase CSAT |
The Decision Panel (Segmenting the ICPs further)
As we established earlier, the product has been designed to address 4 specific use cases. We will now flesh out these ICPs, and have a decision panel for each ICP.
Each ICP target profile described in the overview earlier will have the below personas. Our communication and value prop will also consider these personas. Since we may not interact directly with the some of the panel personas, our communication, and discussion with our target profiles will enable them to address the concerns of the larger decision panel
We want to have a chatGPT like app on our website ~ Customer Use Case Company *
*= Said by a prospect to sales team, as part of the solution requirement
As mentioned earlier, the product is built with specific use cases in mind. That means one level of prioritization has been done, allowing us to target all the ICPs via the product use cases. Therefore, it didn't feel right to run the ICP framework as-is to our ICPs.
However, as a form of experiment, we have utilized the framework as-is, and we have tried to prioritize our ICPs or buyer companies, based on the end-users. We have applied a few parameters like adoption curve, Frequency of use case to our product's end-users i.e., Ecommerce customers, Employees, and contact center agents, while the other parameters have been applied to the buyer companies.
Based on the ICP Prioritization Framework on the end-users, we see the following:
ICP Name | E-Commerce Platforms ✅ | Regular Website Search (BFSI, Healthcare, Retail) ✅ | Large Enterprise (for Employees) ❌ | Contact Center (For customers and Agents) ✅ |
Adoption Curve | High | Low to Medium | Higher ❌ | Lower |
Frequency of Use | High | High | Low ❌ | Very High |
Appetite to Pay | High | High | High | High |
TAM | High | High | Medium | High |
Distribution Potential | Very High | High | Medium | High |
Based on the above points, we will be prioritizing three use cases for the SearchAssist Applications.
The global market for Enterprise Search, estimated at approximately US$6 Billion currently, is
projected to reach a revised size of over US$12 Billion by 2032
It should also be noted that the underlying conversational AI market size is projected to grow to approx. US$ 32 Billion by 2030.
The enterprise search market is getting too crowded in recent times, with many big and small players trying to scale within this space. Some of the tools that SearchAssist is competing against include, but definitely not limited to:
In addition, SearchAssist:
As we saw earlier, the global market for Enterprise Search is
Geographies:
Kore.ai is headquartered in the U.S. and has a presence in Europe, India, Japan, Korea, Australia, LATAM, the Middle East, and SEA regions as well. In terms of geographies, Kore.ai serves all global regions. Also, the SearchAssist application inherently is not industry or domain-specific, and can be implemented for any enterprise looking for an enterprise search solution.
The solution is industry and domain-agnostic, and Kore.ai, as a company, has a global footprint and currently serves all industries across the globe.
Basis this, we can consider the TAM to be the entire market size of $6 Billion currently, which will then increase to $12.2 Billion USD in the coming years.
There is no regional prioritization for Kore.ai as its presence is strong across all adressable regions.
The product and the company have no restrictions in terms of industries or regions to target, and we can address the total market size. However, give that the product has found market validation and has secured an initial set of customers, across all industries, and is now in the early-scaling stage, we should now be looking to strengthen our position in the enterprise search category and increase the the avg. deal value. This is possible when we target our ICPs, primarily within the mid to large scale enterprise segment, that have relatively higher volumes and credibility in their respective industry.
Of the TAM, since our focus is on prioritizing the mid to large-scale enterprises, we are making a conservative assumption that these companies cover up to 75-85% of the market size.
The BFSI, Healthcare, and E-commerce platforms are expected to maintain their top positions across the projected period (till 2032). However, assuming that their position dips, we can expect the market size of our ICPs to fall by 7-10% by 2032. That gives us:
SAM (in 2032) = 75% of market size = $8.54 Billion USD (2032)
With the current rise of LLMs, and Generative AI, we are seeing that there are many new companies and industry veterans entering the enterprise search market. On the other hand, given the product is just a year-old, and there is a growing market segment, we do not have conclusive data on how much is the market share for SearchAssist at this point.
However, Kore.ai, as a company, has a market share of ~2.5% in the conversational AI landscape. If we were to apply the same percentage of market share, plus the benefit of upsell opportunity to the existing 350+ customer base of Kore.ai, we could conservatively assume a market share of 5-6% for the SearchAssist application.
SOM (2024) = 5% of ~$4.08 Billion USD = Approx. $200 Million USD
With Kore.ai already a leader in the market and its continuous focus on R&D, they have brought in differentiating capabilities for the SearchAssist application, like unified search + chat, RAG, etc. Considering that the progress from a technology standpoint would continue at the same pace, if not increase, Kore.ai, as a company, will see the market share rise from 5% to 8-9% by 2032
Taking the conservative 8% for SOM
SOM (2032) = 8% of ~8.54 Billion USD = $680 Million USD
This means that while our SearchAssist application is in the Early Scaling stage, the Kore.ai brand and its primary platform are in the mature scaling stage and have been doubling down on the acquisition channels that have provided the results. This also helps in pitching SearchAssist to prospects and existing customers as well.
Given that the company operates in the B2B SaaS arena and caters primarily to enterprises, the acquisition is primarily driven by the sales channel, but the leads have been generated by a mix of other channels as well, such as
Before we dive into the acquisition framework, we see that while Kore.ai has covered all acquisition channels, the product’s extensibility and the pre-built integrations provide us the scope, i.e., whitespace, for us to experiment with a new channel, which is Product Integration.
Therefore, along with existing channels, we would also introduce Product Integration as part of the acquisition framework. Please note that these channels should be treated primarily as lead generation channels, which will allow the sales team to jump in and drive the opportunity forward
Based on the channel framework and the scope for experiments, we will be prioritizing the following channels for the current stage of acquisition.
Does this mean the other channels are not worth prioritizing?
NO. The reason we're prioritizing these 3 channels is that they are low-cost and are not being utilized currently to the full extent. In addition, Kore.ai has all the resources to afford experiments across these channels. The other channels, such as industry events, earned media, partner programs, paid ads, etc. are already being put to use by Kore.ai for their other products, and the platform created can simply be used for SearchAssist as well. It would not make sense to build the entire cycle on these changels just for one product module.
So, these 3 channels will allow us to maximize the return on top of the current channels that are in use already.
Following are the current search trends (last 30 days) pertaining to the enterprise search category. The monthly average has remained more or less the same over the last 12 months.
While the search volumes may be low, but they are considerable, given how specific the problem the product is trying to solve.
The question is, are we fulfilling the search intent currently?
NO
Out of all the search terms that have significant search volume, SearchAssist does not feature in any related search topics unless and until we search for a very specific keyword .i.e, "conversational search assistance" In fact, even when you search for the industry term "Enterprise Search", the product does not appear anywhere.
Similarly, when we search for the competitor names, there is no sign of SearchAssist even in the entirety of Google search results first page.
Next Steps:
As we have seen, the SEO for the SearchAssist product is currently weak. While we're not saying this is our primary acquisition channel, having a presence allows us to create brand awareness and generate leads that can then be fed into the sales pipeline.
Current Blogs on website
Blog Recommendations (experiments) for the second set:
The objective of this entire exercise is to 'Create the buying Intent', or in this case 'Create the interest'
Before we create content loops, we need to understand where our ICPs are spending time. One common link that we can see in our ICPs is that they are active on LinkedIn, and that will be our preferred channel here.
Content Loop | Hook | Generator | Distributor | Secondary Channel |
---|---|---|---|---|
30-60 Sec video on LinkedIn |
| Kore.ai in-house team |
| To be played on booth screens during expo/summit |
Blog | ICP Targeted articles | Kore.ai team | Through SEO, and LinkedIn | - |
Content Loop Details:
Content Creation:
Create engaging 30-60 sec video for relevant use cases that will allow prospects/viewers to relate the content generation to popular GenAI tools. The key here is to make them relate, not compare.
Examples Video Content:
An E-commerce app/website background
User: Show red lipstick below $10
SearchAssist: There are different shades and brands available. Is there anything specific you're looking for?
User: idk...Maybelline I guess
SearchAssist: Maybelline red lipstick is available. Here are few options - shows options
User sees options > finishes the selection process in chat/product screen > proceeds to payment > completes transaction.
Content Distribution:
The content will be shared first by the Company, and also by the executive leadership team on their LinkedIn pages. The post will also have a CTA, asking people to try out the product for free, and create their own experiences. If needed, a share button can also be created within the tool encouraging users to share a snippet of their conversational flow.
Kore.ai employees will also be encouraged to repost the content. Kore.ai has close to 1000 employees, and an average of 500+ connections each. A conservative 20%-30% actually like/repost the video content on LinkedIn. In addition, AI enthusiasts also like or repost the content organically.
Reiteration and feedback:
As employees engage with the content and share the free trial CTA, their connections see and interact, expanding the reach.
The shared content, if it has the potential, will then again be reposted by Kore.ai company page and employees will reshare and like the reposted content, sparking conversations, and the feedback process. Also, we create newer video content using the insights.
Given that its a B2B SaaS product, I believe it does not matter where our ICP is spending time as per their interest. We have to look it in this way - where can our product be integrated, and if it can be integrated with say ABC, are my ICPs aware and use the ABC platform, will ABC actually help me scale my product or create awareness.
In the case of SearchAssist, there are two such integrations that can be explored:
However, we will prioritize Salesforce AppExchange for now, and expand to other platforms as we grow further. We are prioritizing AppExchange because of the visibility that it would provide.
Search landing page:
How Salesforce AppExchange will help SearchAssist:
Demo Page:
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth — from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patience—you’re about to be impressed.